The FREE Plagiarism Detector Your University Hates! (I Tested 5)

Andy Stapleton
11 Sept 202409:48

TLDRIn this video, the presenter tests five top plagiarism detectors to determine the best one for academic and online plagiarism. They analyze the performance of Dupli Checker, Plagiarism Detector, Search Engine Reports, OnText, and PaperRater. The results vary, but PaperRater stands out for its comprehensive report and high detection rate, making it the recommended choice for academic use.

Takeaways

  • 🔍 The video reviews five plagiarism detectors: Dupli Checker, Plagiarism Detector, Searchenginereports.net, On.com, and PaperPal.
  • ✏️ The test includes checking for academic plagiarism and plagiarism found online.
  • 📝 An original piece of work was tested to ensure it wasn't falsely flagged as plagiarized.
  • 💯 Dupli Checker, Plagiarism Detector, and Searchenginereports.net showed 0% plagiarism for the original text.
  • 🔍 On.com's plagiarism Checker identified a 4.88% plagiarism rate, suggesting it found some similarities.
  • 📊 PaperPal showed a 26-32% similarity rate and provided a detailed report including where the plagiarism was found.
  • 📚 For academic plagiarism, PaperPal detected 96-100% plagiarism in a test using a paper introduction.
  • 🌐 When testing website plagiarism using a Forbes article, Dupli Checker and Plagiarism Detector showed high plagiarism rates.
  • 🚀 PaperPal is recommended due to its high word limit, academic focus, and similarity to university plagiarism detection tools.
  • 💡 Using a VPN can help bypass daily limits on some plagiarism detection tools.
  • 🔗 PaperPal's similarity to Turnitin, which is widely used by universities, makes it a reliable choice for detecting plagiarism.

Q & A

  • Which plagiarism detectors were tested in the video?

    -The video tested Dupli Checker, Plagiarism Detector, Search Engine Reports, On.com, and Paper Pal.

  • What was the purpose of testing an original piece of work in the plagiarism detectors?

    -The purpose was to ensure that an original piece of work wasn't flagged for plagiarism.

  • How much of the original paper was tested for plagiarism?

    -The first 517 words of the original paper were tested.

  • What was the result for the original paper in Dupli Checker?

    -Dupli Checker showed 0% plagiarism.

  • What was the result for the original paper in Plagiarism Detector.net?

    -Plagiarism Detector.net also showed 0% plagiarism.

  • What was the result for the original paper in On.com's plagiarism checker?

    -On.com's plagiarism checker found a 4% similarity, which equates to 4.88% plagiarism.

  • What feature of Paper Pal does the presenter particularly like?

    -The presenter likes that Paper Pal provides a report and the ability to upgrade to Prime for detailed findings.

  • What was the result for the original paper in Paper Pal?

    -Paper Pal showed a similarity of 26 to 32%, suggesting potential plagiarism.

  • What did the presenter do to test academic plagiarism?

    -The presenter used an introduction from a paper about plagiarism to see if the detectors could identify plagiarism within it.

  • Which plagiarism detector had the highest detection rate for the academic plagiarism test?

    -Paper Pal had the highest detection rate, showing 96 to 100% plagiarism.

  • What was the presenter's recommendation for checking plagiarism?

    -The presenter recommended using Paper Pal because it is designed for academia, has a large word limit, and uses Turnitin, which is similar to what universities use.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 Plagiarism Detectors Comparison

The speaker conducted a test on five different plagiarism detectors to determine the best one. They evaluated these tools for both academic and online plagiarism detection. The detectors tested included Dupli Checker, Plagiarism Detector, Search Engine Reports, On.com, and PaperRater. To ensure accuracy, the speaker used an original piece of work that they had written during their PhD, which had never been published. They checked this work with each tool to see if it would be falsely flagged as plagiarized. The results varied, with Dupli Checker showing 0% plagiarism, while PaperRater showed a 26-32% similarity rating, indicating potential plagiarism. The speaker also tested the detectors on a plagiarized academic paper and a Forbes article, noting that PaperRater was particularly effective for academic plagiarism detection, likely due to its design for academic use.

05:01

📊 Results of Plagiarism Detection Tests

The speaker presents the results of their plagiarism detection tests. Dupli Checker and Plagiarism Detector showed high plagiarism detection rates for the plagiarized content, with Dupli Checker detecting 89% plagiarism and Plagiarism Detector at 88%. Search Engine Reports' plagiarism detector indicated 95% plagiarism for the academic content. PaperRater, designed for academic use, identified the plagiarized content with a 96-100% accuracy rate. The speaker also tested website plagiarism detection using a Forbes article, with Dupli Checker showing 93% plagiarism and PaperRater again showing a high detection rate of 97-100%. The speaker recommends PaperRater for its high word limit, academic focus, and similarity to Turnitin, a tool widely used by universities. They also mention using a VPN to bypass daily limits on some detectors and appreciate the text version feature on some platforms to iteratively check for plagiarism.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Plagiarism Detector

A plagiarism detector is a software tool designed to identify and flag instances of plagiarism in written works. It compares the text against a database of existing content to find similarities and potential copying. In the video, the host tests various plagiarism detectors to determine which one is the most effective for academic and online plagiarism detection.

💡Duply Checker

Duply Checker is one of the plagiarism detection tools mentioned in the video. It is used to scan text for plagiarism by comparing it against a database of web content. The host uses Duply Checker to test an original piece of work to ensure it is not falsely flagged as plagiarized.

💡Academic Plagiarism

Academic plagiarism refers to the act of presenting someone else's work or ideas as one's own without proper attribution, typically within an academic context. The video discusses the detection of academic plagiarism and tests the effectiveness of different tools in identifying such instances.

💡Plagiarismdetector.net

Plagiarismdetector.net is another tool tested in the video. It is used to scan for plagiarism and provides a percentage of similarity found in the text compared to existing content. The host uses this tool to check the same original text to see if it detects any plagiarism.

💡Search Engine Reports

Search Engine Reports is a website that offers various tools for SEO, including a plagiarism detector. Although primarily designed for SEO purposes, the host found it recommended for academic work as well. It was used to check the originality of the text.

💡Paper Pal

Paper Pal is a plagiarism detection tool that the host frequently uses and recommends. It is designed with academic use in mind and offers a detailed report of where similarities are found. The host tests Paper Pal to see if it outperforms other tools in detecting plagiarism in academic texts.

💡Turnitin

Turnitin is a widely used plagiarism detection service in educational institutions. It is mentioned in the video as a benchmark for comparing the effectiveness of other free tools. Paper Pal is noted to use Turnitin's database, which could align its results with what universities might find.

💡Word Limit

The word limit refers to the maximum number of words a plagiarism detector tool can process at one time. In the video, the host mentions that some tools have a 1,000-word limit, while others like Paper Pal are more generous, allowing up to 7,000 words in a single submission.

💡Unique Percentage

The unique percentage is a measure provided by some plagiarism detectors that indicates the proportion of the text that is considered original. In the video, the host discusses the unique percentage reported by different tools when scanning the same text.

💡Similarity Percentage

Similarity percentage is the proportion of the text that a plagiarism detector finds matches existing content. The host uses this metric to evaluate the effectiveness of the tools, with lower similarity percentages indicating fewer instances of plagiarism.

💡DOI

DOI stands for Digital Object Identifier, a unique alphanumeric string assigned to digital documents, such as research papers. In the context of the video, a tool identified a DOI, suggesting it found a match in a database of scholarly articles, which is significant for academic plagiarism detection.

Highlights

The author tested the top five plagiarism detectors available online.

The evaluation covered both academic and online plagiarism detection.

Duply Checker was one of the tools tested with a 1,000-word limit.

Plagiarismdetector.net was also tested, showing a 0% plagiarism rate for original content.

Searchengine reports.net's plagiarism detector was found to be suitable for academic use.

On.com's plagiarism checker identified a 4% similarity in an original piece.

Paper pal, frequently used by the author, was tested for its accuracy in detecting plagiarism.

Paper pal showed a 26 to 32% similarity rating for the original content.

The author tested the detectors on an introduction from a plagiarism article.

Duply Checker detected 89% plagiarism in the plagiarized content.

Paper pal identified the plagiarized content with a 96 to 100% accuracy.

The author tested the detectors on a Forbes article to check for website plagiarism.

Duply Checker found a 93% plagiarism rate in the Forbes article test.

Paper pal rated the chance of the Forbes article being plagiarized at 97 to 100%.

Paper pal is recommended for its high word limit and alignment with university detection systems.

The author suggests using a VPN to bypass daily limits on plagiarism checkers.

Ontext.com's plagiarism detector offers a text version feature for iterative checks.